Legal Opinion

Dussin Investment Co. v. Bloxham

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1979No. Civ. 19758Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.

Insofar as this appeal is concerned the action below was one for unlawful detainer by a sublessor against a sublessee for possession of the premises, forfeiture of the sublease and unpaid rent together with interest and costs. The sublessee appeals, contending that as a matter of law the evidence demonstrates that the sublessor had partially, actually evicted him and that, therefore, no rent was owed.

The relationship between the parties and the litigation between them are somewhat complex. Plaintiffs Dussin Investment Company and George T. Dussin are the sublessors…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fifth Avenue Building Co. v. . KernochanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Northwestern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Veysey v. MoriyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API