Legal Opinion
Randall v. Conley
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 22, 2010No. Docket: BCD-09-596PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.
[¶ 1] Mark L. Randall, J. Michael Conley, and Wenonah M. Wirick formed a law practice partnership. After a short time, tensions arose among the three partners. The partnership agreement requires arbitration of any disputes. The parties filed for arbitration and Randall now appeals from a judgment upholding the arbitrator’s award. He argues that the award was procured by fraud and that the arbitrator exceeded his authority in issuing a clarification of the arbitration award. We affirm the judgment.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2] Randall, Conley, and Wirick signed an agreement under which, in part,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- St. Francis De Sales Federal Credit Union v. Sun Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Wooldridge v. WooldridgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Anderson v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Child of Nicholas P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- North East Insurance v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Alberta Graf v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- PIKE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Bradbury v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.