Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1892No. 7760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Omitting formal parts, the indictment alleges that appellant, “ in the county of Houston and State of Texas, on the first day of October, A. D. 1891, with malice aforethought, in and upon D. H. Bayne, did make an unlawful assault, with intent then and there to kill him, the said D. H. Bayne, against the peace and dignity of the State.” A motion in arrest of judgment was urged against this indictment, because it charged the assault was made with intent to kill, and not with intent to murder, the assaulted party.

In order to constitute this offense, it is essential that the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API