Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1955No. Appeal, No. 135PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Jones,

The court below dismissed an objecting property owner’s appeal from an order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia sustaining the issuance by the City’s administrative zoning officer of a use registration permit to the applicant (and present intervenor) for the construction of an office and factory on property in the Somerton section of the 35th Ward of the City. The objecting property owner has appealed.

The sole question involved is whether the City’s amendatory zoning ordinance of 1952, which reclassified the property in question as available for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. GRATTON v. CONTESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Lindquist AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Fleming v. Prospect Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Dooling's Windy Hill, Inc. v. Springfield Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Landau Advertising Co. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Van Sciver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Boyle AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Key Realty Co. Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API