Legal Opinion

Simpson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1952No. 13020_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

An information was filed against appellant, Leona Simpson, under §§ 2 and 20 of the Alaska Uniform Narcotic Drug Act, 1 A.C.L.A.1949, 2 §§ 40-3-2 and 40-3-20. Section 2 of the Act, A.C.L.A.1949, § 40-3-2, provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense, or compound any narcotic drug, 3 except as authorized in this Act.” 4 Section 20 of the Act; A.C.L.A.1949, § 40-3-20, provides: “Any person violating any provision of this Act shall upon first conviction be punished, for the first…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. SimsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. GosselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Heng Awkak RomanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  5. People v. FontenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API