Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re McKinney

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 2, 1996No. 19-30746PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

POLLY S. HIGDON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the court on the trustee’s motion to modify the debtor’s Chap ter 13 plan. Upon review it is clear that the trustee seeks two court rulings. First, he asks the court to interpret the current confirmed plan. Second, if he prevails on the issue of interpretation he asks the court to modify that plan to increase the stated percentage to unsecured creditors.

The plan was confirmed on February 13, 1994. The debtor has no secured debt and the plan provided for 0% distribution to general unsecured creditors. Thus only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re PhelpsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. Casper v. McCullough (In Re Casper)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. In Re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. In Re CasperUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. In Re GuentertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. Turek v. Dehart (In Re Turek)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API