Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. International Ass'n of MacHinists

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1961No. Civ. 24913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate. Petitioners seek reinstatement in respondent union, having been expelled for “conduct unbecoming a member.’’ The conduct involved is their “peaceable, open, public, active, and vigorous campaign and support” for Proposition 18, the “right-to-work” law, in contravention of the expressed official policy of the union. (Respondents will be referred to in the singular.)

Petitioner Mitchell was a member of respondent from 1942 to July 8, 1959, the date of his expulsion. Petitioner Mulgrew was a member from 1953 until his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of Boy Scouts of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
  3. Zelenka v. BPOE OF THE USNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Directors Guild of America, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Smedley v. Capps, Staples, Ward, Hastings & DodsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API