The Boeing Company v. Maziar Movassaghi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:
We affirm the district court’s decision that a California law governing cleanup of a federal nuclear site violates the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity. Because we decide that the state law impermissibly regulates and discriminates against the federal government and its contractor, we do not reach the question of whether the federal laws governing nuclear materials and cleanup of hazardous substances preempted the state law. We need not reach Boeing’s Section 1983 claim for a declaratory judgment and an injunction.
FACTS
The federal government made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Student Loan Servicing Alliance v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Greg Adkisson v. Jacobs Engineering Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Greg Adkisson v. Jacobs Eng'g Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.