Atkinson v. Pellegrino
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Chief Justice.
This appeal is on the judgment roll without a bill of exceptions. We have before us the pleadings, the findings of fact, the conclusions of law and the judgment. Annexed by counsel at the end of the judgment roll is a number of asserted irregularities and errors that are urged upon the attention of the court by counsel for the appellant; but we cannot consider them. Counsel has entitled them “Bill of Exceptions” when in fact they are assignments of error. The so-called Bill of Exceptions has never been settled; there is no certificate signed by the trial judge stating…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tooele Improvement Co. v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- Metz v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
- Larsen v. Madsen, Madsen v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Bachman v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.