Legal Opinion
Holmes v. MELEADY
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 5, 2010No. Civil Action 09-11219-NMGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Marlon Holmes (“Holmes”) brings suit against several police officers from the town of Springfield, Massachusetts pursuant to the federal civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for alleged constitutional violations. Before the Court are motions to dismiss and to transfer by the defendants and motions for miscellaneous relief by Holmes.
I. Factual Background
This dispute arises out of plaintiffs arrest nearly 13 years ago. The following factual allegations are gleaned, to the extent possible, from plaintiffs various submissions. At about…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Logie v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Cayo v. FitzpatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Decarvalho v. TelfordDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Holmes v. MeleadyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Sean Doyle, et al. v. Federal Express Corporation, successor by merger to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.; Calvin Aleyn, et al. v. Federal Express CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026