Bull v. Siegrist
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.
The plaintiff is the owner of the NE% of the NEi/4 of section 22 and the N% of the Ny2 of section 23, T. 1 S., R. 38 E., W. M. These lands are now and heretofore have been irrigated entirely from the flow of certain described springs which rise on or immediately above plaintiff’s land. He also uses the water flowing from these springs for stock and for domestic use.
The defendants, as successors in interest of one G. I. Wade, are the owners of an adjoining tract of land consisting of 400 acres lying immediately south of the lands owned by the plaintiff. These premises are irrigated by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ebell v. City of BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Adams v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Hayes v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawson v. SchuchardtWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- England v. Ally Ong HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- England v. Ally Ong HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968