Legal Opinion

Royal v. White Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action by William L. Boyal against the White Oil Corporation to recover damages for personal injuries received in consequence of the slipping of a plank on which the plaintiff was standing while engaged in looking in a water tank to see if it was full of water.. ■ William L. Royal was employed by the White Oil Corporation to1 keep certain tanks full of water, and was hurt while in the discharge of his duties. He was employed by the defendant’s superintendent on the first day of June, 1922, as- a pumper, and was directed to take -charge of one shift of the pumping which lasted from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fordyce Lumber Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Railway Co. v. KeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Marcum v. Three States Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. LylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Maher v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. St. Louis &8212 San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Williamson Williams v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Eureka Oil Company v. MooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API