Legal Opinion

Eureka Oil Company v. Mooney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Cleo Mooney, appellee’s intestate, was employed as a pumper at one of the oil wells of the appellant company, in Union County. A dam had been constructed by appellant across a ravine, and, as the oil flowed from the well, it ran down this ravine to a dam -and formed a pool. The pool was about thirty feet across at the lower end, and was about two feet deep.

A plank about seven or eight feet long was used as a walkway from the dam out into the pool to an intake pipe of a suction pump. One end of the plank rested on the dam and the other rested on a cross-piece nailed to two stobs which, had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HempflingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StampsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Arkansas Light & Power Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Fordyce Lumber Co. v. LynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Railway Co. v. KeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Covington v. Little Fay Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Reddell v. NortonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Eureka Oil Company v. MooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API