President of India v. International Marine Development
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Circuit Judge:
The question posed in this appeal is whether a vessel owner is under a duty to transship, salvage or off-load and redeliver cargo aboard a vessel after termination by reason of frustration of a charter party contract of private carriage. The district court, D.C., 328 F. *765Supp. 1316, held that the cargo owner was not entitled to recover. We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. On June 19, 1969, appellant, India Supply Mission, entered into a voyage contract of charter party with appellee, International Marine Development Corp., owner of the S.S. HULDA, to carry a cargo of bagged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz Horn v. Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Alabama Fruit and Produce Companu, Cia De Navegacion Fruco, S.A. And J. R. Atkins, D/B/A Albama Fruit and Produce Company v. Heinrich C. Horn, of the M/s Heinz HornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- The Monarch of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In The Matter Of: The Complaint And Petition Of International Marine Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971