Legal Opinion

Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. Nichols

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1932No. 21367PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

In an action upon two policies of industrial life-insurance, Lillie Nichols was awarded a verdict and judgment against Bankers Health & Life Insurance Company for $239. A motion for a new trial was denied, and exceptions were taken.

It is urged in support of the general grounds of the motion *537for a new trial that iiie plaintiff below, in her own belialf, testified falsely concerning essential facts upon which her right to a recovery depended, and that consequently her entire testimony should have been rejected, agreeably to the maxim “falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.” To maintain this theory…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wells v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. PlumerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. General Motors Corp. v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Associates Discount Corp. v. Lindsey Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API