Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. Plumer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The order of the judge overruling the motion for new trial was not subject to the exception that it appears on its face that he did not use any judicial discretion and did not pass on any ground of error assigned or that it appears that he did not approve the verdict.
In the first special ground of the motion the defendant complains of the following charge of the court: “The plaintiff in this case, as I have already read to you, claims an additional sum as attorney’s fees. He contends that the defendant has acted in bad faith, has been stubbornly litigious,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lovell v. FrankumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- McKenzie v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Twin City Lumber Co. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Mutual Life Insurance v. ChamblissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by22 opinions
- Georgia-Carolina Brick & Tile Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Altamaha Convalescent Center, Inc. v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- First Bank of Clayton County v. DollarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Speir Insurance Agency, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Pickett v. Chamblee Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.