Stokes v. City of Mishawaka
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
The appellants are homeowners residing outside the city limits of Mishawaka. They sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that an ordinance zoning a tract of land for commercial development was invalid. After a hearing the trial court ruled that appellants (“homeowners”) did not have standing to maintain their action and should take nothing by way of their complaint. From a denial of their motion to correct errors homeowners now appeal.
The homeowners reside in a wooded area adjacent to the city limits of Mishawaka. The land lying within the city contiguous to this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- PM Gas & Wash Co., Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Hobart Common Council v. Behavioral Institute of Indiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Perry-Worth Concerned Citizens v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Burt v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Eberhart v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Prock v. Town of DanvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.