Legal Opinion

Stokes v. City of Mishawaka

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1982No. 3-481A106PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

The appellants are homeowners residing outside the city limits of Mishawaka. They sought a declaratory judgment to the effect that an ordinance zoning a tract of land for commercial development was invalid. After a hearing the trial court ruled that appellants (“homeowners”) did not have standing to maintain their action and should take nothing by way of their complaint. From a denial of their motion to correct errors homeowners now appeal.

The homeowners reside in a wooded area adjacent to the city limits of Mishawaka. The land lying within the city contiguous to this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. PM Gas & Wash Co., Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Hobart Common Council v. Behavioral Institute of Indiana, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Perry-Worth Concerned Citizens v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Burt v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Eberhart v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Prock v. Town of DanvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API