Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tegeler v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1996No. 80498Published

1DissentJustice McMORROW

The majority today determines that the insurance adjuster in the case at bar "misrepresented the facts regarding an existing time limitation on the settlement offer” (173 Ill. 2d at 509-10) and, therefore, that the employer is estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense. This holding is contrary to the express findings of the Industrial Commission that the claimant was not misled during the settlement negotiations. There is nothing in the record which indicates that the Industrial Commission’s findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence, as they must be, for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pantle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Chief Judge of the Circuit Court v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31, AFL-CIOIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Parro v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Castaneda v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kaskaskia Constructors v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API