Legal Opinion

Quinto v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 17, 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated July 1, 2003, which granted the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority for leave to serve an amended answer to include assumption of risk as an affirmative defense and denied his cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint to include causes of action to recover damages pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e and for loss of consortium on behalf of the plaintiffs wife.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Generally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Williams v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Leszczynski v. Kelly & McGlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Kramer v. Twin County GrocersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gover v. Mastic Beach Property Owners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Link v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. McAvoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Lewis v. PalazzoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Wall v. Starbucks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API