Legal Opinion

Leszczynski v. Kelly & McGlynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2001PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for employment discrimination, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 4, 2000, as denied that branch of his motion which was to amend his complaint to add Patricia Drago as a defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action in 1995 alleging, inter alia, employment discrimination in violation of the State Human Rights Law (Executive Law art 15). In 1999 he moved to amend the complaint to add United States Fire Insurance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Zanani v. SavadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Sidor v. ZuhoskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Tarantini v. Russo Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ortega v. Bisogno & MeyersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Murphy v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Santori v. Met LifeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Probst v. CacoulidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Cerabono v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API