Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1919PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On error to Essex Oyer and Terminer Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bergen, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of murder of the first degree without recommendation as to pun*438ishment, and by a writ of error seeks to reverse that judgment.

The first point argued in support of this writ is the refusal of the trial court to accept a plea of non vult tendered by the defendant, which he claims is his right under section 107 of the Crimes act, amended in 1917 (Pamph. L., p. 801). Prior to the amendment of 1917, section 107 prohibited the acceptance of a plea of guilty on an indictment for murder, with the proviso that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Winston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cicenia v. LagaySupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. State v. Van VlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Clark v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API