Legal Opinion

Redding v. Vermillion

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 27, 1976No. Civ. A. 75CV467-W-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS TO GRANT PETITIONER A TIMELY PAROLE REVOCATION HEARING

WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief Judge.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under Section 2241, Title 28, United States Code, by a state inmate currently in custody in the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections. Petitioner seeks an adjudication that he is being denied his federal constitutional right to a timely parole revocation hearing by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. Petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant v. State of WisconsinDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
  2. Hicks v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  3. Gregory v. New York Parole CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Redding v. VermillionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API