Legal Opinion

Adams v. Klapper

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

James H. Shaw, Jr., J.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 16 of the Election Law to declare invalid the designating petition purporting to nominate Molly Klapper for the public office of *52Judge of the Civil Court for the Fifth Municipal District in the September 14, 1999 primary.

While, as a general rule, a candidate’s designating petition will be invalidated on the ground that some signatures have been fraudulently obtained “only if there is a showing that the entire designating petition is ‘permeated with fraud’ (Matter of Ferraro v McNab, 60 NY2d 601, 603;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Proskin v. MayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Flower v. D'ApiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. MATTER OF HASKELL v. GargiuloNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. MacDougall v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haygood v. HardwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Adams v. KlapperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Haygood v. HardwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API