Ferraro v. McNab
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*603OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Absent a finding that the candidates’designating petition is permeated with fraud, a showing that some signatures were not properly obtained should not result in invalidation of the entire designating petition. Inasmuch as the petition in the present case has sufficient valid signatures, the Appellate Division correctly ordered that the candidates’ names be restored to the ballot. Further, appellant’s contention that the petition should be invalidated because some signatures also appeared on a…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Hennessey v. DiCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Drace v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Perez v. GalarzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Bonner v. NegronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- MacDougall v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.