Legal Opinion

Johns Hopkins University v. 454 Life Sciences Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 26, 2017No. C.A. No. 13-1853-LPSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STARK, U.S. District Judge:

On November 6, 2013., Johns Hopkins University (“JHU” or “Plaintiff’) filed this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, seeking review of the Decision and Final Judgment of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”) in Interference No. 105, 857 (“the Interference”). ■ (See D.I. 1 at 1, 8; Statement of Admitted Facts (“SAF”) D.I. 102-1 ¶ 1) The interfering applications are JHU’s U.S. Patent Application No. 12/361,690 (D.I. 39 Ex. 1) (JHU’s “ ’690 application”) and U.S. Patent Application No. 13/33,240 (D.I. 39 Ex. 5) (454’s “ ’240…

2Cases cited29 opinions

Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.