Legal Opinion

Schuchman/Samberg Investments, Inc. v. Hoosier Penn Oil Co. Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2016No. 49A02-1508-MI-1051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case Summary

ALTICE, Judge.

[1] In this certified interlocutory appeal, Schuchman/Samberg Investments (SSI) appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Hoosier Penn Oil Company, Inc., Union Oil Company of California, and BP Corporation North America,’- Inc. (collectively, the Former Operators) on SSI’s claims under Indiana’s Environmental Legal Actions Statute (ELA) and Petroleum Releases Statute (PRS). Specifically, the trial court ruled that the ELA claim was time-barred and that SSI had not established that it had a right to recover under the PRS. SSI-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Pflanz v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Siwinski v. Town of Ogden DunesIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Elkhart Foundry & Machine Co., Inc. v. City of Elkhart Redevelopment Commission for the City of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. REFINED METALS CORPORATION v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API