Legal Opinion

Trokov v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided April 20, 2000No. GDTC-AA-99-107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGAN, Judge.

I. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The appeal before the court was brought by the plaintiff, Ivo Trokov, pursuant to Ordinance No. 95-6. The defendants have not raised any claims regarding the authority of this court to adjudicate the matter.

Prior to June 17, 1999, the plaintiff was employed in the Mohegan Sun Casino. As a part of this employment, the plaintiff was duly licensed by the Gaming Commission. His employment at the casino as a dealer depended upon his license. On June 16, 1999, the plaintiff was arrested by the Noi-wich Police Department pursuant to an arrest warrant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pineiro v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cherestal v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2002
  2. Carpenter v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API