People v. Dominick
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J. *
Introduction
In this consolidated appeal, defendants Michael James Dominick, Steven Michael Romero and Clifton J. Shedelbower raise numerous challenges to the judgments in which each received a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. We affirm the convictions.
Procedural History
After a severance was granted as to defendant Shedelbower, defendants Dominick and Romero were tried by separate juries in a joint trial. Thereafter Shedelbower waived jury and his case was submitted on various transcripts, including the transcript of the codefendants’ trial.
All…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BittakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. San NicolasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.