Legal Opinion

People v. Dominick

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1986No. B003318PublishedCited by 34 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J. *

Introduction

In this consolidated appeal, defendants Michael James Dominick, Steven Michael Romero and Clifton J. Shedelbower raise numerous challenges to the judgments in which each received a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. We affirm the convictions.

Procedural History

After a severance was granted as to defendant Shedelbower, defendants Dominick and Romero were tried by separate juries in a joint trial. Thereafter Shedelbower waived jury and his case was submitted on various transcripts, including the transcript of the codefendants’ trial.

All…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. BittakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. San NicolasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API