Legal Opinion
Keiko Larez, and v. William Holcomb, and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 22, 1994No. 91-55822, 91-56145, 91-56283 and 91-56284PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Los Angeles Police Department Detective William Holcomb appeals the judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Keiko Larez in La-rez’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Larez’s civil rights complaint alleged that Detective Holcomb stopped her, arrested her, and then detained her for several hours at a police station for questioning without probable cause, in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. Holcomb asserts that the district court committed reversible error in its jury instructions. Larez cross-appeals the court’s order that denied her motion to impose sanctions on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Golden Eagle Distributing Corporation v. Burroughs Corporation, and Kirkland & EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Larez v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Trulock v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lambert v. AckerleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.