At & T Communications, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUFE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are (1) Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, or, in the Alternative, for Partial Referral to the Surface Transportation Board, and for a Stay Pending Resolution by the Surface Transportation Board; and (2) Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order. For the reasons set out below, the Court will deny the motion to dismiss; grant the motion to refer; grant in part and deny in part the motion for a stay; and deny the motion for a protective order.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff in this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015