Legal Opinion

Portland v. Postill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

The main question presented here is as to the method of awarding damages, it being claimed by the appellant that, in making the award of damages with respect to any lot or parcel of land, the city engineer and the council must ascertain and declare the rights of all parties interested, and make a sepárate award of damages for each person with respect to his rights in the property and damages thereto. On the other hand, it is claimed by the respondent that such a course would be impracticable and that it is not required by the charter or statute; that both the charter and statute contemplate a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wakefield v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. State of Oregon v. CERRUTIOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Highway Commission v. SauersOregon Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API