International Tooth Crown Co. v. Hanks Dental Ass'n
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Action at Law for Infringement of Patent.
1Opinion of the CourtLacombe, Circuit Judge
(charging jury). It is a very mistaken system of jurisprudence that leaves the decision of the issues of fact that arise in a patent case to a jury. In the. very nature of things, it is extremely awkward and difficult, and many times practically impossible, for 12 laymen, untrained in the examination of the intricate questions which so frequently arise in patent causes, without any facilities for taking notes, and with no opportunity for the lengthened reflection which is frequently necessary to reach a wise conclusion in cases of this kind,—I say it is many times practically impossible for…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Calumet Service Co. v. City of ChiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Gateway City Transfer Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Hanks Dental Ass'n v. International Tooth Crown Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.