People ex rel. Flint v. Harrington
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuba County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
At the time of the alleged removal of the relator from the office of “practicing physician of the Tuba County Hospital,” the board of supervisors of that county consisted of five members, two of whom had been prohibited by an order of the Superior Court from participating in the proceedings, which it is claimed on behalf of respondent resulted in the removal of the relator from saicl office.
The three members of said board who had not been prohibited from proceeding in said matter heard evidence upon the charges laid before said board against the relator, and finally, by a vote of two to one,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- In re Union InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cal. Building Industry Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Supreme Court · 2018
- People ex rel. Hoffman v. HechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ryan v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ursino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.