Legal Opinion

Hazen Engineering Co. v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1959No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

In an effort to determine a simple legal problem, based upon facts easily ascertainable and beyond legitimate dispute, the appellant corporation filed a bill in equity on December 10, 1951. It, and presumably the taxing authorities, wanted to know whether the corporation was a “manufacturer,” as the term is used in a tax ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, and the act authorizing the adoption thereof, and an act imposing a tax on residents of the school district of that city.

The city and school district both answered the bill, and after considerable testimony was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. Northern Elec. L. & P. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1891
  4. Commonwealth v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. H. M. Rowe Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Philadelphia School District v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. Weldon Pajamas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. TuckerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Directory Publishing Co. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API