Hazen Engineering Co. v. Pittsburgh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
In an effort to determine a simple legal problem, based upon facts easily ascertainable and beyond legitimate dispute, the appellant corporation filed a bill in equity on December 10, 1951. It, and presumably the taxing authorities, wanted to know whether the corporation was a “manufacturer,” as the term is used in a tax ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, and the act authorizing the adoption thereof, and an act imposing a tax on residents of the school district of that city.
The city and school district both answered the bill, and after considerable testimony was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. Northern Elec. L. & P. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1891
- Commonwealth v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- H. M. Rowe Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Philadelphia School District v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth v. Weldon Pajamas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- City of Pittsburgh v. TuckerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Directory Publishing Co. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.