Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 18, 1987No. 05-86-01138-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

A jury convicted Robert Allen Mills of reckless injury to a child and assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Mills complains in his first point of error that the evidence is insufficient for conviction. This is a circumstantial evidence case. As a rule, evidence suffices for conviction if a rational trier of fact, taking the evidence most favorable to the prosecution, could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 n. 12, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 n. 12, 61…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Quinones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Lynn Murphy Creel v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Tezino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  5. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API