Mills v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
HECHT, Justice.
A jury convicted Robert Allen Mills of reckless injury to a child and assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Mills complains in his first point of error that the evidence is insufficient for conviction. This is a circumstantial evidence case. As a rule, evidence suffices for conviction if a rational trier of fact, taking the evidence most favorable to the prosecution, could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 n. 12, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 n. 12, 61…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Quinones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Lynn Murphy Creel v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Tezino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.