Legal Opinion
De Foe v. National Capital Bank of Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1952No. 1225PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants moved in the trial court to vacate a judgment which had been entered against them in a proceeding in which they had not been served with process but., in which had been filed a praecipe signed ,by them and purporting to be a consent to entry of judgment. Their motion was denied on January 16,' 1952.- On January 21 they filed a motion for a rehearing of the motion to vacate. This motion was denied on February 1. On February 4 they filed a motion to reconsider the denial to grant a rehearing of the motion to vacate. This motion was denied on February 18 and on February 28 they filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marten v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Burke v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Gersing v. ChafitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Consolidated Radio Artists, Inc. v. Washington SectionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- 901 CORPORATION v. A. Sandler Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- De Levay v. Marvins Credit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Fowler v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Lombard v. WelchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ware v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.