Kowalsky v. Whipkey
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiffs are wife and husband and sue to recover their respective damages for injuries sustained by Mrs. Kowalsky in a collision of an automobile negligently driven on the public street by one Whipkey with an automobile driven by Mrs. Kowalsky. Causal negligence of Whip-key and injury to the plaintiffs are conceded. The defendant Hansen is the owner of the car driven by Whipkey and recovery is sought against him and his 'insurer under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Whipkey was not served with process, and it is not known where he is. At .the close of the evidence the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Zurn v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Kressin v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Borger v. McKeithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Boehringer v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Adams v. Quality Service Laundry & Dry CleanersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Boehringer v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.