State v. Byron
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant D. Byron 1 appeals his jury conviction of driving while intoxicated. Byron claims the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict and his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all the evidence should have been granted. For the following reasons, the judgment is reversed.
Background
Byron only challenges the sufficiency of the evidence; he claims that the court should have granted his motion for acquittal. In reviewing this, we are limited to a determination of whether the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Boatmen's Savings Bank v. OverallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GittemeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RoyalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.