Legal Opinion

Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Overall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1885PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Lubke, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

This cause presents some close questions, and it is not without hesitation that we have arrived at the conclusions announced in this opinion.

The appellants are garnishees on attachment proceedings brought against one Wm. Y. Kay, as indorser of two notes of the Missouri Cotton Seed Oil’Company. The notes which were made by Kay as president of the company bore date November 13, 1880, and were payable' sixty days after-date. The indebtedness evidenced by them originated in November, 1879, and January, 1880.

The garnishees, who are attorneys at law, answering plaintiff’s interrogatories, denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holton v. South Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Hurley v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Fisher v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Summons v. BeaubienSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Holmes v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State v. DodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Pariso v. TowseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API