Legal Opinion
Ferrara v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 13, 2005No. Civ.00-11693-MLWPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONCERNING RESENTENCING
WOLF, District Judge.
I. SUMMARY
As described in the April 12, 2005 Memorandum and Order, petitioner Vincent Ferrara has proven that he was denied Due Process when the government violated its clearly established constitutional duty to disclose to Ferrara, before trial, important exculpatory information that directly negated his guilt on charges that Ferrara had directed his codefendant Pasquale Barone to murder Vincent James Limoli. See Ferrara v. United States, 2005 WL 903196 (D.Mass., April 12, 2005). This Memorandum should be read in the context of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Intellectual Ventures I, LLC v. Lenovo Grp. Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.