Legal Opinion

Myatt v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment proceeding are Washington County attorneys who contend in their complaint that the defendants are violating plaintiffs’ constitutional rights by requiring them to accept the defense of indigents charged with crime or within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court without guaranteeing to plaintiffs fair, just, reasonable and adequate compensation as conditions of appointment to represent such indigents. The trial judge sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that:

“ i* * * The Oregon Legislature has the sole responsibility in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. ApodacaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Spencer v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gast v. State, by and Through StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Cornelius v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Goose Hollow Foothills League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Cornelius v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API