Legal Opinion

Cropper v. Graves

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 1958No. [No. 189, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the appellants, defendants below, showed sufficient cause or controversy to strike out a judgment entered against them by confession and have said controversy submitted to a jury for determination.

On April 16, 1957, the appellee obtained a judgment by confession against the appellants in the Circuit Court for Worcester County. Within the time permitted by Maryland Rule 645 b, the appellants filed a motion to strike out the judgment, alleging that they were entitled to certain credits on the note, which the appellee had refused to give them.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Remsburg v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Bolotin v. SelisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Lincoln National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Stankovich v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Gordon v. State National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Williams v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API