Legal Opinion

Strawbridge v. Stern

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Trover by Justice Strawbridge and Isaac Clothier, co-partners, against Henry Stern and Jacob Levy, impleaded with Charles Livingston and Nathan Block, copartners. From a judgment for defendants Stern and Levy on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiffs filed a declaration against the defendants, containing two counts, the fitst charging a conspiracy to defraud against the four parties jointly, the second being an ordinary count in trover, the property mentioned in each count being the same, and consisting of dry goods sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants Livingston & Block. On the trial of the case the plaintiffs’ attorney announced that no recovery would be sought under the first count in the declaration. The record also shows that there was no evidence in the case that Stern or Levy conspired with the other defendants to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Dahms v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dyer v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cogswell v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Cooper v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Otto v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Albrecht v. St. Hedwig's Roman Catholic Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Diel v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Carr v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Dealey Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API