Legal Opinion

State v. Hawks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 23, 1989PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

At issue on this appeal, here as of right because of a dissent below, see Rule 2:2-l(a)(2), are the mandatory extended-term provisions of the Graves Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6c and N.J.S.A. 2C:44-3d. The precise question is whether those provisions apply to a defendant whose first Graves Act offense is the subject of his second Graves Act conviction.

The majority in the Appellate Division, in an opinion reported at 214 N.J.Super. 430 (1986), upheld the trial court’s imposition of an extended term, a result consistent with State v. Windsor, 205…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. StewartSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. State v. ToweySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State v. HaliskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. State v. PillotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. State v. LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  5. United States v. William J. Jefferson, A/K/A Buddy Jefferson, William JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API