Legal Opinion

Pellet v. Hoboken

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 24, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Defendants appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County, on January 10, 1949, in a proceeding in lieu ofmandamus. This judgment requires the defendants (1) to "immediately restore plaintiff, Otmar J. Pellet, to the pay emoluments, title and position given or undertaken to be given to Charles J. DeFazio, Jr., on or about June 4, 1947, regardless of the name by which that position or title is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunziker v. KentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. State v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
  3. Board of Commissioners v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  4. Board of Commissioners v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Falcone v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY MED. SOC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Pellet v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. De Fazio v. Mayor and Council of City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API