Legal Opinion

De Fazio v. Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 13, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 N.J. Super. 515 (1951)

79 A.2d 877

CHARLES DE FAZIO, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 26, 1951.

Decided March 13, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Anthony J. Armore argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Samuel J. Davidson, attorney).

Mr. E. Norman Wilson argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Dominick R. Rinaldi, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. City of Camden v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  4. Pellet v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Pellet v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. O'CONNOR v. CalandrilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. DEP'T. OF CIVIL SERVICE v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Rawitz v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API