Legal Opinion

Menges v. Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1980No. 78-3111, CA 14406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

Petitioners brought this writ of review proceeding to contest various actions and the decision of the Jackson County Hearings Council and Board of County Commissioners (Board) in granting the city of Gold Hill a conditional use permit to construct a sewage treatment facility on a 3.46 acre parcel in an area zoned F-5 (farm-residential; 5-acre minimum lot size). Petitioners own homes or reside in the area of the proposed facility site. They appeal from the trial court’s order affirming the Board’s decision. We reverse.

Petitioners advance six arguments, which will be described in the course of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tierney v. DurisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. West v. City of AstoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Rutherford v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City Council of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. ALB. COMMONS PARTNERSHIP v. City CouncilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City Council of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Menges v. Board of County CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Feitelson v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API