Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1050The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim for the alleged medical malpractice. The mere fact that the respondents were in possession of the infant’s medical records did not, without more, establish that the respondents had actual knowledge of a potential injury. “Where, as here, there is little to suggest injury attributable to malpractice during delivery, comprehending or recording the facts surrounding the delivery cannot equate to knowledge of facts underlying a claim” (Williams v Nassau County Med.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Lodati v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Pico v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Casias v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Bucknor v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Snyder v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API