Legal Opinion

Hurliman v. Seckendorf

New York City Court

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from order denying motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover one month’s rent of certain premises leased by him to defendants. Defendants, by their answer, admitted the lease, and set up sundry affirmative defenses and counterclaims, to which plaintiff replied, denying tlie same. Plaintiff obtained a verdict in his favor, and from the judgment entered thereon and -the order denying motion for a new trial, as well as from the exceptions taken on the trial, defendants take this appeal.

At the commencement of the trial the defendants claimed that they were entitled to the affirmative and to the right to open and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Importers & Traders' National Bank v. PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Gilhooley v. . WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Smith v. SergentNew York Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rainier Co. v. SmithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  2. Trenkmann v. SchneiderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  3. Phfee v. DaleAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  4. Regan v. KelleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API