Legal Opinion

Rainier Co. v. Smith

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Rew York, entered upon a verdict in ■favor of the plaintiff, rendered by direction of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff herein leased to one Timothy D. Healey certain premises at a yearly rental of $7,000, together with such taxes and Croton water charges as might be imposed thereon during the year. Healey agreed to pay the rent and taxes monthly in advance. The defendant was surety for Healey under the lease. Healey subsequently assigned the lease to the Harvard Automobile and Garage Company, but it does not appear that the plaintiff ever released Healey from any obligations under the lease. The plaintiff’s interest in the premises leased by it was through a lease to itself from Lewis M. Borden…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Boehm v. RichNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  3. Riglander v. Nile Tobacco WorksAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Michaels v. FishelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. George A. Fuller Co. v. Manhattan Construction Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fleming v. FlanaganJustice Court of Town of Ramapo · 1998
  2. Daniel Holding Corp. v. Two Thirty Four West Forty Second Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Wagner Building, Inc. v. United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  4. Zeiss v. WursterCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  5. Dorb v. WaybrightAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API